The Trump Administration's Latest Performance: A State-Sanctioned Spectacle of Violence
In the early 20th century, anarchist movements embraced a radical tactic known as "propaganda of the deed." This involved staging dramatic acts of violence to galvanize public support for revolutionary causes. Fast-forward to today, and it appears that President Trump's administration has adopted this concept with disturbing results.
The use of spectacle and performance is nothing new in American politics. The Works Progress Administration's New Deal-era performances, plays, concerts, and traveling shows are a notable example. However, when we talk about "propaganda of the deed," we're referring to a more sinister form of showmanship designed to shock and intimidate.
A recent incident involving Luigi Mangione's alleged shooting attempt on United Healthcare CEO Bryan Thompson exemplifies this phenomenon. The stunt was meant to draw attention to a perceived injustice, but ultimately served only to highlight the administration's willingness to engage in high-octane performances that can be leveraged for their own gain.
However, it is when the state itself becomes the perpetrator of spectacle and violence that things take a darker turn. Case in point: the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago, where police brutally suppressed protests with live television coverage serving as both a warning and an example to others who dared challenge the status quo.
The Minneapolis incident involving U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents killing Renee Macklin Good and Alex Pretti is another stark illustration of this phenomenon. Footage of the killings was widely disseminated, serving not only as a public service announcement but also as a tool for intimidation against those who would question the administration's policies.
The Trump administration has mastered the art of co-opting tools once used by activists to promote accountability and instead using them to quell dissent. The proliferation of citizen videography, which was initially a powerful means of holding authorities accountable, is now being repurposed as state media, effectively turning it into propaganda for the regime.
The result is an atmosphere of fear, where those who dare challenge the administration's narrative risk facing violent retribution or, worse still, having their actions dismissed as mere "fake news." In this sense, "propaganda of the deed" has become a tool for silencing dissent, rather than spurring revolution.
In the early 20th century, anarchist movements embraced a radical tactic known as "propaganda of the deed." This involved staging dramatic acts of violence to galvanize public support for revolutionary causes. Fast-forward to today, and it appears that President Trump's administration has adopted this concept with disturbing results.
The use of spectacle and performance is nothing new in American politics. The Works Progress Administration's New Deal-era performances, plays, concerts, and traveling shows are a notable example. However, when we talk about "propaganda of the deed," we're referring to a more sinister form of showmanship designed to shock and intimidate.
A recent incident involving Luigi Mangione's alleged shooting attempt on United Healthcare CEO Bryan Thompson exemplifies this phenomenon. The stunt was meant to draw attention to a perceived injustice, but ultimately served only to highlight the administration's willingness to engage in high-octane performances that can be leveraged for their own gain.
However, it is when the state itself becomes the perpetrator of spectacle and violence that things take a darker turn. Case in point: the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago, where police brutally suppressed protests with live television coverage serving as both a warning and an example to others who dared challenge the status quo.
The Minneapolis incident involving U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents killing Renee Macklin Good and Alex Pretti is another stark illustration of this phenomenon. Footage of the killings was widely disseminated, serving not only as a public service announcement but also as a tool for intimidation against those who would question the administration's policies.
The Trump administration has mastered the art of co-opting tools once used by activists to promote accountability and instead using them to quell dissent. The proliferation of citizen videography, which was initially a powerful means of holding authorities accountable, is now being repurposed as state media, effectively turning it into propaganda for the regime.
The result is an atmosphere of fear, where those who dare challenge the administration's narrative risk facing violent retribution or, worse still, having their actions dismissed as mere "fake news." In this sense, "propaganda of the deed" has become a tool for silencing dissent, rather than spurring revolution.