US Considers Broader Sanctions on Sudanese Army and RSF as Ceasefire Efforts Falter
The United States is mulling a significant escalation in sanctions against key players in the ongoing conflict in Sudan. The move comes after US envoy Massad Boulos failed to persuade the warring parties to accept a ceasefire, casting doubt on the prospects of resolving the war.
A growing list of countries has expressed concern over the conflict's devastating impact on civilians, with estimates suggesting that 40,000 people have lost their lives and over 14 million more displaced. Saudi Arabia and Egypt have publicly backed the Sudanese army, while the United Arab Emirates has supported the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), fueling a humanitarian crisis.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently assured President Trump's direct involvement is necessary to resolve the situation, but his efforts so far have been unsuccessful. In a recent cabinet meeting, Rubio stated that only Trump has the capacity to resolve the Sudan crisis, a claim that has sparked skepticism among some observers.
The US may use its leverage to impose stricter sanctions on all parties involved in the conflict, including the RSF and army leadership. Additionally, Washington is expected to take steps to enforce and extend the UN arms embargo on Darfur, which has largely targeted these groups.
Norway's Foreign Ministry plans to invite a broad range of Sudanese society to Oslo in coming weeks to outline the parameters for a civilian government. The UN estimates that the conflict has killed at least 40,000 people, with many more victims among the displaced population.
The US move may be aimed at privately pressuring the UAE and Saudi Arabia, which have both denied supporting extremist groups despite overwhelming evidence. Furthermore, Trump's administration is considering labeling the Muslim Brotherhood a foreign terrorist organization, which could weaken support for the Sudanese army.
As tensions escalate in Sudan, the international community is calling on all parties to end hostilities. The UN Human Rights Chief Volker Türk has warned of "a new wave of atrocities" amid renewed fighting in Kordofan region.
The United States is mulling a significant escalation in sanctions against key players in the ongoing conflict in Sudan. The move comes after US envoy Massad Boulos failed to persuade the warring parties to accept a ceasefire, casting doubt on the prospects of resolving the war.
A growing list of countries has expressed concern over the conflict's devastating impact on civilians, with estimates suggesting that 40,000 people have lost their lives and over 14 million more displaced. Saudi Arabia and Egypt have publicly backed the Sudanese army, while the United Arab Emirates has supported the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), fueling a humanitarian crisis.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently assured President Trump's direct involvement is necessary to resolve the situation, but his efforts so far have been unsuccessful. In a recent cabinet meeting, Rubio stated that only Trump has the capacity to resolve the Sudan crisis, a claim that has sparked skepticism among some observers.
The US may use its leverage to impose stricter sanctions on all parties involved in the conflict, including the RSF and army leadership. Additionally, Washington is expected to take steps to enforce and extend the UN arms embargo on Darfur, which has largely targeted these groups.
Norway's Foreign Ministry plans to invite a broad range of Sudanese society to Oslo in coming weeks to outline the parameters for a civilian government. The UN estimates that the conflict has killed at least 40,000 people, with many more victims among the displaced population.
The US move may be aimed at privately pressuring the UAE and Saudi Arabia, which have both denied supporting extremist groups despite overwhelming evidence. Furthermore, Trump's administration is considering labeling the Muslim Brotherhood a foreign terrorist organization, which could weaken support for the Sudanese army.
As tensions escalate in Sudan, the international community is calling on all parties to end hostilities. The UN Human Rights Chief Volker Türk has warned of "a new wave of atrocities" amid renewed fighting in Kordofan region.
. The US wants to step up the sanctions, but it's like they're trying to play whack-a-mole with extremist groups - you knock one down, another two pop out 
. I mean, who hasn't got a friend or family member stuck in Darfur? It's time for some real talk, maybe Norway can host a "Sudanese soap opera" in Oslo and get everyone on the same page 
. And honestly, Trump wants to label the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist org? That's like putting a "wanted" poster on your own grandma 
. Something needs to change, but for now, it's just a never-ending cycle of conflict and human suffering 
I'm really worried about what's happening in Sudan right now 
. 40,000 people dead and over 14 million displaced? That's just heartbreaking 
. I don't think sanctions are the way to go though... I mean, we all know how that can affect innocent civilians 
. They're already struggling so much, do we really need to make things worse?
.
. We need to support organizations that are working with civilians, not just governments or corporations. And maybe, just maybe, we can find a way to bring peace back to Sudan without further escalating things 
.
Trump's involvement seems like a good idea, but his cabinet meeting comment is kinda laughable... "only he" can solve the crisis? Like what about diplomacy or something? 
40k people dead and 14 million displaced? It's like the world is ignoring what's happening over there 
I'm not sure what's more concerning, the fact that a ceasefire is failing or the US is considering escalating sanctions 
We can't just put all the blame on one party, it feels like we're missing the point. The UAE and Saudi Arabia need to be held accountable for their actions too, but labeling the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization? That's just going to create more chaos 
It's not like they're hiding it that well. The fact that Trump thinks he's the only one who can resolve this situation is just laughable... I mean, has anyone seen his track record on international conflicts? 
it's like we're all missing something fundamental here. what if the problem isn't with the US or Saudi Arabia or UAE, but rather with how these conflicts are being framed? like, instead of pitting the army against the RSF, why can't we be talking about finding common ground for a more equitable solution? 
i know it sounds simple, but sometimes the most complex problems require the simplest solutions. 
I mean, I get that everyone wants to protect their interests, but at what cost? 
Sanctions are just gonna make things worse, cause more suffering for innocent people. We need to be thinking about ways to bring people together, not drive them further apart. And labeling groups as terrorists is just so... divisive 
And with the RSF and army leadership being targeted now, it's gonna get even worse. We need some real help from the international community ASAP 
. I'm not sure about the UAE and Saudi Arabia backing the RSF though, they're hiding something behind those nice faces 
. And what's with this labeling thing? It just creates more division and hurt 
.
according to UNHCR, over 80% of internally displaced persons are women & children 
. and let's not forget about the RSF, they're like a well-oiled machine... 
. I mean, on one hand, you have the Sudanese army that's been doing some pretty sketchy stuff, like attacking civilians and committing war crimes 
.
. I mean, the UN has a team in Oslo trying to set up parameters for a civilian government, which sounds like a great start 
. Maybe we can learn from that example and try to find a way forward that works for everyone 
.
. But what can you do, I guess? The US is trying to get involved with stricter sanctions, but will that even make a difference? It's all just so complicated 
.