US Considers Granting Asylum to UK's Perceived Threatened Jewish Community
The Trump administration is reportedly weighing a drastic move: granting asylum to Jewish individuals from the United Kingdom, citing rising antisemitism as a major concern. According to sources close to President Donald Trump, his personal lawyer, Robert Garson, has been in discussions with the US State Department about providing refuge for British Jews fleeing what they perceive as an increasingly hostile environment.
Garson, a 49-year-old former British barrister turned US lawyer, believes the UK is no longer a safe haven for Jews. He attributes this sentiment to recent events, including an Islamist attack on a synagogue in Manchester and widespread antisemitism following the Hamas attack on Israel in October 2023. In his view, these incidents have pushed British Jews to consider emigrating to the US as a means of safety.
Critics of Israeli policy in the UK have faced backlash from Jewish community members who feel their views are being unfairly maligned as anti-Semitic. Garson has been vocal in his criticism of these protesters, calling them "marauding mobs" and accusing them of promoting antisemitic chants.
Garson's comments have sparked debate within the US administration about whether to offer asylum to British Jews. He sees this proposal as an attractive option due to the community's high level of education, language proficiency, and relatively low crime rates. However, details on how these refugees would be processed remain unclear.
Some observers question the timing of this proposal, given the Trump administration's own stance on immigration. The US plans to restrict refugee admissions in 2026 to just 7,500 spots, with a focus on white South Africans. It is not immediately clear whether British Jews would fit into these proposed quotas.
As tensions between Israel and Palestine continue to simmer, the question of safety for Jewish communities around the world remains a pressing concern. With rising antisemitism in the UK, some may wonder if Garson's proposal is an overreaction or a pragmatic response to a genuine threat.
The Trump administration is reportedly weighing a drastic move: granting asylum to Jewish individuals from the United Kingdom, citing rising antisemitism as a major concern. According to sources close to President Donald Trump, his personal lawyer, Robert Garson, has been in discussions with the US State Department about providing refuge for British Jews fleeing what they perceive as an increasingly hostile environment.
Garson, a 49-year-old former British barrister turned US lawyer, believes the UK is no longer a safe haven for Jews. He attributes this sentiment to recent events, including an Islamist attack on a synagogue in Manchester and widespread antisemitism following the Hamas attack on Israel in October 2023. In his view, these incidents have pushed British Jews to consider emigrating to the US as a means of safety.
Critics of Israeli policy in the UK have faced backlash from Jewish community members who feel their views are being unfairly maligned as anti-Semitic. Garson has been vocal in his criticism of these protesters, calling them "marauding mobs" and accusing them of promoting antisemitic chants.
Garson's comments have sparked debate within the US administration about whether to offer asylum to British Jews. He sees this proposal as an attractive option due to the community's high level of education, language proficiency, and relatively low crime rates. However, details on how these refugees would be processed remain unclear.
Some observers question the timing of this proposal, given the Trump administration's own stance on immigration. The US plans to restrict refugee admissions in 2026 to just 7,500 spots, with a focus on white South Africans. It is not immediately clear whether British Jews would fit into these proposed quotas.
As tensions between Israel and Palestine continue to simmer, the question of safety for Jewish communities around the world remains a pressing concern. With rising antisemitism in the UK, some may wonder if Garson's proposal is an overreaction or a pragmatic response to a genuine threat.