Former Special Counsel Jack Smith has faced intense scrutiny over his decision to charge President Trump with crimes in Florida and Washington D.C. In a bid to clear the air, Smith delivered an opening statement to the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday, January 22, 2026.
During his remarks, Smith defended his actions, stating that he was guided by a thorough examination of the evidence against Trump. He emphasized that his investigation was not motivated by politics, but rather a commitment to upholding the law and ensuring accountability for those in power.
Smith's defense came as some lawmakers had questioned the basis for charging Trump with certain crimes, claiming that they fell outside the scope of his authority as former President. Smith pushed back against these concerns, arguing that the statute of limitations had not yet expired on several key offenses.
The special counsel also addressed allegations that his investigation was influenced by Democrats or other external factors. He insisted that his team had worked tirelessly to gather evidence and remain impartial throughout the inquiry.
Despite Smith's efforts to justify his actions, some lawmakers expressed skepticism about his claims. The controversy surrounding Trump's charges is likely to continue for months to come, with implications far beyond Washington D.C.'s corridors of power.
During his remarks, Smith defended his actions, stating that he was guided by a thorough examination of the evidence against Trump. He emphasized that his investigation was not motivated by politics, but rather a commitment to upholding the law and ensuring accountability for those in power.
Smith's defense came as some lawmakers had questioned the basis for charging Trump with certain crimes, claiming that they fell outside the scope of his authority as former President. Smith pushed back against these concerns, arguing that the statute of limitations had not yet expired on several key offenses.
The special counsel also addressed allegations that his investigation was influenced by Democrats or other external factors. He insisted that his team had worked tirelessly to gather evidence and remain impartial throughout the inquiry.
Despite Smith's efforts to justify his actions, some lawmakers expressed skepticism about his claims. The controversy surrounding Trump's charges is likely to continue for months to come, with implications far beyond Washington D.C.'s corridors of power.