A Detroit man who spent over 17 years in prison for a murder he didn't commit was given the chance to go free - but only if he agreed not to sue the Wayne County prosecutors.
Gregory Berry's case is a stark example of how flawed convictions can be tainted by coercive interrogations and tactics that courts have found unconstitutional. In his original trial, Berry was found guilty almost entirely on the testimony of Antonio Hamilton, who later recanted his statement and passed a polygraph saying he had lied about Berry's involvement in the crime.
The Wayne County Prosecutor's Office initially claimed that prosecutors had made no such arrangement with Berry, but an internal memo from Maria Miller shows otherwise. According to court files obtained by Metro Times, prosecutors insisted on a plea deal that included waiving civil suit rights as a condition of release.
Berry says he was pressured into taking the plea deal due to his poor health and a looming Christmas holiday. He claims prosecutors withheld information about the coercive tactics used in the interrogation of his co-defendant, Antonio Hamilton, whose testimony was key to Berry's conviction.
The CIU, which investigates potential wrongful convictions, got involved in the case after Berry's co-defendant testified that he had lied about Berry's involvement. The unit concluded that "significant problems" had emerged in the case, and Berry's lawyer argues that prosecutors should have disclosed this information to him before he agreed to take the plea deal.
Despite his efforts to withdraw his plea, Berry remains convinced that prosecutors manipulated him into accepting a deal that would deny him justice. His case raises questions about how Wayne County prosecutors are handling convictions tainted by Simon, who has been accused of coercing statements in other cases.
Gregory Berry's case is a stark example of how flawed convictions can be tainted by coercive interrogations and tactics that courts have found unconstitutional. In his original trial, Berry was found guilty almost entirely on the testimony of Antonio Hamilton, who later recanted his statement and passed a polygraph saying he had lied about Berry's involvement in the crime.
The Wayne County Prosecutor's Office initially claimed that prosecutors had made no such arrangement with Berry, but an internal memo from Maria Miller shows otherwise. According to court files obtained by Metro Times, prosecutors insisted on a plea deal that included waiving civil suit rights as a condition of release.
Berry says he was pressured into taking the plea deal due to his poor health and a looming Christmas holiday. He claims prosecutors withheld information about the coercive tactics used in the interrogation of his co-defendant, Antonio Hamilton, whose testimony was key to Berry's conviction.
The CIU, which investigates potential wrongful convictions, got involved in the case after Berry's co-defendant testified that he had lied about Berry's involvement. The unit concluded that "significant problems" had emerged in the case, and Berry's lawyer argues that prosecutors should have disclosed this information to him before he agreed to take the plea deal.
Despite his efforts to withdraw his plea, Berry remains convinced that prosecutors manipulated him into accepting a deal that would deny him justice. His case raises questions about how Wayne County prosecutors are handling convictions tainted by Simon, who has been accused of coercing statements in other cases.