The US desperately needs a new antiwar movement to counter President Trump's aggressive foreign policy. Following the disastrous experience of the Iraq war, which ended with a majority of Americans and even some Republicans admitting it was a "mistake," Washington is once again on the brink of another costly and unpopular military intervention.
Trump's defiance of international law and global norms has led him to take an increasingly militarized approach to foreign policy, including threats against Venezuela and Cuba. The administration's gleeful disregard for traditional constraints on war-making is reminiscent of George W Bush's cowboy bluster in 2003, but Trump's unilateralism is even more brazen.
The antiwar movement of the early 2000s was instrumental in eroding public support for the Iraq war, which had become increasingly unpopular by 2005. The movement's focus on appealing to Americans' hearts and minds helped to shift public opinion against the war. Today, a similar coalition-building effort is needed to prevent Trump from embarking on another costly and ill-fated military adventure.
Progressives and Democrats may be tempted to dismiss the idea of an antiwar movement with Republicans as "imperialism lite," but this approach could lead to a failure to challenge Trump's aggression at all. The left must learn to work with like-minded Republicans who oppose war, even if they disagree on other issues.
The key to success lies in building a broad and visible coalition that can challenge Trump's foreign policy agenda. This will require a new kind of antiwar movement that is more inclusive and strategic than its predecessors. It must be able to build on the lessons of the past while also being adaptable and responsive to changing circumstances.
Ultimately, the antiwar movement needs to focus on preventing war before it starts, rather than simply reacting to it after it has begun. This requires a deep understanding of the dangers of imperialism and the importance of international law and diplomacy in preventing conflict.
As Jeremy Varon notes, "the tendency of empire is to overreach." Trump's administration is already demonstrating this trait by using military force as a way to assert American power and influence abroad. The antiwar movement must be vigilant and proactive in challenging these impulses and promoting a more peaceful and cooperative foreign policy.
By working together across party lines, the antiwar movement can help to prevent another costly and unpopular war and promote a more just and peaceful world.
Trump's defiance of international law and global norms has led him to take an increasingly militarized approach to foreign policy, including threats against Venezuela and Cuba. The administration's gleeful disregard for traditional constraints on war-making is reminiscent of George W Bush's cowboy bluster in 2003, but Trump's unilateralism is even more brazen.
The antiwar movement of the early 2000s was instrumental in eroding public support for the Iraq war, which had become increasingly unpopular by 2005. The movement's focus on appealing to Americans' hearts and minds helped to shift public opinion against the war. Today, a similar coalition-building effort is needed to prevent Trump from embarking on another costly and ill-fated military adventure.
Progressives and Democrats may be tempted to dismiss the idea of an antiwar movement with Republicans as "imperialism lite," but this approach could lead to a failure to challenge Trump's aggression at all. The left must learn to work with like-minded Republicans who oppose war, even if they disagree on other issues.
The key to success lies in building a broad and visible coalition that can challenge Trump's foreign policy agenda. This will require a new kind of antiwar movement that is more inclusive and strategic than its predecessors. It must be able to build on the lessons of the past while also being adaptable and responsive to changing circumstances.
Ultimately, the antiwar movement needs to focus on preventing war before it starts, rather than simply reacting to it after it has begun. This requires a deep understanding of the dangers of imperialism and the importance of international law and diplomacy in preventing conflict.
As Jeremy Varon notes, "the tendency of empire is to overreach." Trump's administration is already demonstrating this trait by using military force as a way to assert American power and influence abroad. The antiwar movement must be vigilant and proactive in challenging these impulses and promoting a more peaceful and cooperative foreign policy.
By working together across party lines, the antiwar movement can help to prevent another costly and unpopular war and promote a more just and peaceful world.
it's supposed to be really good, but I haven't had a chance yet. You know how hard it is to find time for food when you're busy scrolling through social media 
anyway, back to politics... did you see that funny video of a squirrel trying to steal a human's sandwich? 
it's just the cutest thing ever. oh wait, what were we talking about again?
. With Trump's aggressive foreign policy, it's clear that we need a fresh wave of activism to counter his militaristic approach 
. The Iraq war debacle was a wake-up call for Americans, and it's high time we learned from those lessons 
.
. We can't afford to dismiss the idea of working with like-minded folks across party lines 
. It's not about being bipartisan; it's about being pragmatic and focused on preventing war 
.
. We need to focus on prevention, rather than just reacting after the fact 
. The left should learn from past successes and failures, while staying vigilant against Trump's imperialistic tendencies 
.
. By working together, we can promote a more peaceful and just world – one that doesn't rely on military force as a first resort 
.
Trump's approach is definitely concerning, but I also get why some folks are worried about being seen as "imperialist" or "soft on national security". Can't we find common ground on the fact that more military intervention can lead to real-life consequences? 
We should focus on building bridges with people who share our values, even if they don't always agree with us on other issues. It's all about finding ways to challenge Trump's approach without being too confrontational. 
... With Trump's aggressive foreign policy, it feels like we're heading towards another costly and unpopular war 
. The early 2000s antiwar movement was super effective in shifting public opinion against the Iraq war, but I think we need a new, more inclusive approach to stop Trump from making the same mistakes 
. We need to build a broad coalition that can challenge Trump's agenda and promote a more peaceful foreign policy 
. It's all about being proactive, not reactive, and stopping wars before they start 
. We need to be vigilant and challenge Trump's impulses, rather than just reacting to his actions 
. Let's work together across party lines to promote a more just and peaceful world 
.
. And let's be real, if we don't get some heavy hitters on board, this whole thing is just gonna fizzle out 
.
and yeah, building coalitions across party lines is key, can't just be all about pitting libs against cons 
.
. Let's make some noise and bring about real change 
!
it's like we need a new movement or something to counter all this aggression 
. It's time to focus on preventing war before it starts, rather than just reacting to it after it begins