Wyden Blasts Kristi Noem for Abusing Subpoena Power to Unmask ICE Watcher

US Customs Agency Under Fire for Unmasking Social Media Accounts Tracking Immigration Agents

Senator Ron Wyden has sent a stern letter to the Department of Homeland Security, urging it to cease its alleged abuse of customs law to unmask social media accounts tracking immigration agents. The move comes as part of an ongoing effort by the Trump administration to silence critics and crack down on dissenting voices.

In October, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) issued a summons to Meta, forcing the company to disclose the identity of MontCo Community Watch, a Facebook and Instagram account that tracks the actions of immigration authorities. The move was met with resistance from a federal judge, who temporarily blocked Meta from disclosing user data in response to the summons.

Wyden's letter highlights this case, as well as an earlier attempt by CBP to unmask the operator of a Twitter account critical of President Donald Trump. In 2017, the department issued a legal demand to Twitter based on its authority for "ascertainment, collection, and recovery of customs duties," despite having no apparent connection to the importation of merchandise or customs duties.

An investigation by the DHS Office of Inspector General found that CBP had initially claimed it needed the account's identity to investigate possible criminal violations, but ultimately relied on its legal authority for a dubious reason. The report concluded that the agency may have exceeded its authority and proposed reforms, including a new policy requiring summonses to be reviewed for "legal sufficiency."

Wyden's letter argues that DHS is abusing its customs investigatory authority to repress First Amendment protected speech. He calls on the department to cease its actions and ensure compliance with statutory limitations on the use of 19 U.S.C. Β§ 1509.

This case is part of a broader pattern of authoritarianism and censorship under the Trump administration, as highlighted by The Intercept in recent reports. Critics argue that the government is using its power to silence dissenting voices and undermine press freedom, with devastating consequences for democracy.

As The Intercept continues to investigate these developments, it relies on your support to remain independent and unbiased. Join our mission to defend democracy and hold those in power accountable.
 
🚨 just read that US Customs Agency is under fire for unmasking social media accounts tracking immigration agents πŸ€• its like they think silencing critics is a good idea πŸ™„ i mean who needs freedom of speech when you can just spy on ppl online 😳 this whole thing reeks of authoritarianism and censorship 🚫 gotta wonder what other ways the Trump admin is trying to crack down on dissenting voices πŸ€”
 
πŸ€” This is getting out of hand, you know? Like, what's next? They gonna unmask us all just for having opinions online? 🚫 It's like they think we're hiding something or that our free speech is a crime or something... Newsflash: it's not. The fact that they're trying to silence critics and dissenting voices should be super alarming. I mean, what's the Trump admin's end game here? Are they trying to control what people can say online? It's like a bad sci-fi movie πŸŽ₯. And now we gotta worry about our social media accounts being unmasked? That's just plain creepy. 😱
 
Man 🀯, I'm getting major flashbacks of the Nixon era when they were messing with journalists left and right... Fast forward to 2025 and it's like we're living that drama all over again πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. The whole thing just feels so fishy - CBP trying to unmask these social media accounts like they're some kind of enemies of the state πŸ€”. I mean, what's next? They gonna start tracking our memes too? πŸ˜‚

And can we talk about how this is all connected to that whole Trump administration drama? It just seems like they're trying to silence anyone who disagrees with them, which is basically the definition of authoritarianism 🚫. But you know what really gets my goat? The fact that they think they can just use customs law to do whatever they want and get away with it... no way, Jose! πŸ‘Š
 
πŸˆπŸ˜• I'm totally freaked out by this news... like, what's going on with the US government? 🀯 They're basically saying that they can just unmask anyone who's critical of them online, without any evidence or due process... it's super Orwellian.

And the thing is, social media companies are supposed to be supposed to be protecting user privacy and security, not helping the government spy on people. I mean, what's next? πŸ€” Will they start requiring everyone to have a government-approved social media account? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

I'm also really worried about free speech in the US right now... if you speak out against the government, you're basically risking being silenced or even having your identity exposed. 😬 That's not democracy, that's authoritarianism.

And what's with all these claims of "repressing First Amendment protected speech"? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ Isn't that just a fancy way of saying they want to shut down dissenting voices? I don't think so... we need more free speech, not less. πŸ’¬
 
πŸ€– This is getting out of hand. I mean, who gives the thumbs up to unmasking someone's online activity just because they're talking trash about a politician? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ It's not exactly revolutionary stuff – just people expressing their opinions and holding those in power accountable. The fact that CBP can just swoop in and demand Meta hand over user data like it's nobody's business is just plain weird. 😏 And what's next? Unmasking everyone who's ever tweeted something negative about the administration? 🚫 It's time for some serious checks and balances on these so-called "investigatory" powers. Can't we just have a free and fair exchange of ideas without being surveilled? πŸ€”
 
It's just another example of how the powers that be are trying to control the narrative πŸ’¬. I mean, come on, who needs a summons to unmask someone just because they're exercising their right to free speech? It's like they're trying to stifle dissenting voices and silence critics... which is basically what authoritarian regimes do 🀐. And let's not forget, this all started under the Trump administration, where the "rule of law" seems to be more of a suggestion than a hard and fast rule 🚫. The fact that Senator Wyden is speaking out against this abuse of power shows he's still got some backbone left πŸ’ͺ. We need more voices like him in Washington, holding those in power accountable for their actions πŸ‘Š.
 
🚨 this is getting creepy - a govt agency is basically telling social media companies who's who and what's allowed to be said πŸ€– so the first thing that comes to mind is the importance of online anonymity and free speech 🌐 as we see more cases like this, it's becoming increasingly clear that there are people in power trying to stifle dissenting voices πŸ’¬ and I'm not sure if anyone's doing enough to call them out on it yet πŸ‘€
 
come on guys πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ... can't even share a thread without worrying about getting doxxed? like i get it, tracking immigration agents is serious business, but unmasking social media accounts just feels like overkill to me πŸ˜’. and now wyden's all up in arms about it, and honestly, it kinda feels like the foxes are guarding the henhouse πŸ“πŸ‘€... senator wyden's letter highlights this ridiculous case where cbp tried to unmask a twitter account critiquing trump, but what about the precedent being set? 🀯 we're already living in a world where free speech is under attack, and now we've got lawmakers who are supposed to be defending it? πŸ™„... it's like, i'm all for holding people accountable, but not at the cost of our very freedom to express ourselves πŸ’”.
 
😬 I'm really concerned about the US Customs Agency's actions here... it seems like they're using their authority to silence people who are just trying to speak out against them. πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ Social media accounts should be free from fear of being tracked or exposed, especially when those accounts are highlighting issues with immigration policies. 🚫 As someone who values clear and concise writing (I mean, have you seen the formatting on the Intercept's website? πŸ”₯), I think it's really important to hold those in power accountable for their actions and ensure that they're not abusing their authority. πŸ’ͺ We need more transparency and less censorship, especially when it comes to issues of public interest. πŸ“š
 
omg u guys i just heard about this crazy thing that's going down with the US Customs Agency 🀯 they're literally trying to unmask people who are tracking immigration agents on social media! like what even is the point of that? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ and it gets worse because the Trump admin is all like "we need to silence critics" but really it's just an excuse for them to chill on free speech πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ anyway i'm totally team Wyden and think he should keep pushing back on this stuff πŸ’ͺ
 
Ugh, this is just another example of the Trump admin trying to stomp out free speech 🀯 I mean, what's next? Are they gonna unmask every single journalist and activist who dares to speak out against their policies?! πŸ“° It's like they think they're above the law or something. And don't even get me started on how ridiculous it is that they're trying to use customs laws to track people down just because they're criticizing them. I mean, come on! That's not how democracy works, folks. We need to stand up for our rights and fight back against this kind of authoritarianism, or we'll be living in a dystopian nightmare πŸŒͺ️ Can you believe that the department is already rewriting its policies to cover their tracks? It's like they're trying to sweep everything under the rug and pretend it never happened. No way, Jose! We need to keep pushing back against this kind of nonsense and holding those in power accountable πŸ’ͺ
 
I'm getting really worried about where this is all headed 🀯. I mean, I've seen some shady stuff go down over the years, but this takes the cake. Unmasking social media accounts just because someone's speaking out against something they don't agree with? That's not freedom of speech, that's intimidation. And it's happening under a Trump admin... what's next, right-wing extremist groups getting a free pass to harass and silence anyone who dares to disagree with them? 🚫 I'm all for holding people accountable, but we gotta make sure we're doing it in a way that doesn't trample our rights as citizens. This whole thing just feels like more of the same old power play. πŸ˜’
 
πŸ€” The whole situation just seems like a classic case of the government trying to exert too much control over the public's voice πŸ—£οΈ. I mean, come on, who are they to unmask social media accounts tracking immigration agents? It's not like these accounts are doing anything wrong in themselves - they're just exercising their right to free speech and holding those in power accountable.

And it's not just this one case, either. The fact that the DHS Office of Inspector General found out that CBP had initially claimed they needed an account's identity for a "investigation" but ultimately used a completely unrelated reason suggests that there's some serious accountability lacking here πŸ™„.

As a society, we need to be vigilant about protecting our freedom of speech and press. If we let the government get away with silencing dissenting voices, then where does that leave us? It's like the old saying goes: "If you're not paying attention, they're controlling you." πŸ‘€
 
Back
Top