ExpressVPN has unveiled two significant updates that have left users wondering if they're experiencing déjà vu. On Android, iOS, and Mac devices (excluding Windows, Linux, and smart TVs), the Fastest Location button now automatically selects the server with the fastest download speed and lowest latency. While this feature may seem redundant, ExpressVPN's new implementation differs from its previous "Smart Location" algorithm.
The Smart Location feature used to pick the best available server based on metrics such as download speed, latency, and distance. However, it appears that these same metrics are now being used under the umbrella of Fastest Location, sparking speculation about whether ExpressVPN has revised or replaced the underlying algorithm in response to customer feedback. Testing is needed to confirm this assertion.
In a separate development, ExpressVPN has also launched a revamped native Mac app, built using Project Catalyst technology that allows developers to create desktop-native software from iOS apps. The new interface boasts a richer look and feel, utilizing screen space more effectively like Proton VPN. This upgrade addresses the limitations of previous Mac clients, which felt like adapted mobile apps rather than fully optimized desktop experiences.
The Smart Location feature used to pick the best available server based on metrics such as download speed, latency, and distance. However, it appears that these same metrics are now being used under the umbrella of Fastest Location, sparking speculation about whether ExpressVPN has revised or replaced the underlying algorithm in response to customer feedback. Testing is needed to confirm this assertion.
In a separate development, ExpressVPN has also launched a revamped native Mac app, built using Project Catalyst technology that allows developers to create desktop-native software from iOS apps. The new interface boasts a richer look and feel, utilizing screen space more effectively like Proton VPN. This upgrade addresses the limitations of previous Mac clients, which felt like adapted mobile apps rather than fully optimized desktop experiences.