New Jersey politicians who previously cried foul over congestion pricing remain eerily silent about PATH fare hikes, which are set to more than double over the next four years.
In fact, many lawmakers from the Garden State made a show of their opposition to MTA's congestion pricing plan last year, with Gov. Phil Murphy, Rep. Josh Gottheimer and Gov.-elect Mikie Sherrill all speaking out against the plan. However, when it comes to the PATH fare hike, which will push fares from $3 to $4 by 2029, these same politicians seem to have lost their voices.
The contrast is striking - while they were quick to decry what they saw as an attack on New Jersey drivers, a far smaller number of riders are affected by the PATH fare hikes. The lack of outcry suggests that car culture remains deeply ingrained in the state, where the convenience and mobility of cars takes precedence over public transportation.
Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop, whose term expires at the end of the year, is an exception to this silence. He initially supported congestion pricing but now says he's on board with the fare hike because it's tied to service improvements. "Those things come at a cost," he said.
Fulop also pointed out that while fares only cover a quarter of the PATH's operating costs, the agency does receive fewer public subsidies than other transit agencies in the country.
However, an organizer with the transit advocacy group A Better PATH said it's no surprise that New Jersey lawmakers are quiet on this issue. "It is a fine example of car centricity," he said. "Added costs to drivers are a news story and added cost to transit users is an afterthought."
In contrast, other officials have spoken out in support of the fare hike, including New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, who urged the Port Authority to keep PATH fares affordable for lower-income riders.
The final vote on the PATH fare hike is still pending, but it's hard to see the measure failing with virtually no opposition from elected officials.
In fact, many lawmakers from the Garden State made a show of their opposition to MTA's congestion pricing plan last year, with Gov. Phil Murphy, Rep. Josh Gottheimer and Gov.-elect Mikie Sherrill all speaking out against the plan. However, when it comes to the PATH fare hike, which will push fares from $3 to $4 by 2029, these same politicians seem to have lost their voices.
The contrast is striking - while they were quick to decry what they saw as an attack on New Jersey drivers, a far smaller number of riders are affected by the PATH fare hikes. The lack of outcry suggests that car culture remains deeply ingrained in the state, where the convenience and mobility of cars takes precedence over public transportation.
Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop, whose term expires at the end of the year, is an exception to this silence. He initially supported congestion pricing but now says he's on board with the fare hike because it's tied to service improvements. "Those things come at a cost," he said.
Fulop also pointed out that while fares only cover a quarter of the PATH's operating costs, the agency does receive fewer public subsidies than other transit agencies in the country.
However, an organizer with the transit advocacy group A Better PATH said it's no surprise that New Jersey lawmakers are quiet on this issue. "It is a fine example of car centricity," he said. "Added costs to drivers are a news story and added cost to transit users is an afterthought."
In contrast, other officials have spoken out in support of the fare hike, including New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, who urged the Port Authority to keep PATH fares affordable for lower-income riders.
The final vote on the PATH fare hike is still pending, but it's hard to see the measure failing with virtually no opposition from elected officials.