NJ leaders who hated on congestion pricing notably silent on PATH fare hikes

New Jersey politicians who previously cried foul over congestion pricing remain eerily silent about PATH fare hikes, which are set to more than double over the next four years.

In fact, many lawmakers from the Garden State made a show of their opposition to MTA's congestion pricing plan last year, with Gov. Phil Murphy, Rep. Josh Gottheimer and Gov.-elect Mikie Sherrill all speaking out against the plan. However, when it comes to the PATH fare hike, which will push fares from $3 to $4 by 2029, these same politicians seem to have lost their voices.

The contrast is striking - while they were quick to decry what they saw as an attack on New Jersey drivers, a far smaller number of riders are affected by the PATH fare hikes. The lack of outcry suggests that car culture remains deeply ingrained in the state, where the convenience and mobility of cars takes precedence over public transportation.

Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop, whose term expires at the end of the year, is an exception to this silence. He initially supported congestion pricing but now says he's on board with the fare hike because it's tied to service improvements. "Those things come at a cost," he said.

Fulop also pointed out that while fares only cover a quarter of the PATH's operating costs, the agency does receive fewer public subsidies than other transit agencies in the country.

However, an organizer with the transit advocacy group A Better PATH said it's no surprise that New Jersey lawmakers are quiet on this issue. "It is a fine example of car centricity," he said. "Added costs to drivers are a news story and added cost to transit users is an afterthought."

In contrast, other officials have spoken out in support of the fare hike, including New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, who urged the Port Authority to keep PATH fares affordable for lower-income riders.

The final vote on the PATH fare hike is still pending, but it's hard to see the measure failing with virtually no opposition from elected officials.
 
I mean, I don't know... πŸ€” This whole thing is super confusing to me! On one hand, I get why they're making the fare hikes happen - public transportation needs some help and it's not like people are just gonna magically start using the PATH more or something... but at the same time, it seems kinda shady that these politicians who were all about hating on congestion pricing are now cool with increasing fares for the PATH riders! πŸ€‘ Like, I get it, they didn't think through it properly or whatever, but still...

And don't even get me started on how it's affecting car culture in NJ... I mean, we should be promoting public transportation more and less about just getting from point A to B by car, right? πŸš—πŸ˜’ But at the same time, if these politicians really care about the environment or something, shouldn't they be pushing for changes that benefit everyone, not just drivers?! πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop is one of the only ones speaking out on this, and I kinda respect that... but still, it's all pretty confusing to me! πŸ’β€β™€οΈ
 
I mean, can u believe this? The politicians in New Jersey are all like "we hate congestion pricing" one minute, but then suddenly their mouths are sealed when it comes to PATH fare hikes... πŸ€” It's like they're trying to protect the car culture vibe that's so strong in Jersey. And what really gets me is how the lawmakers who spoke out against congestion pricing are now conveniently silent about the fare hike. 🚫 It's like they think transit users aren't paying attention or something! I'm all for people speaking up when it comes to issues affecting their community, but this is just weird... πŸ˜’
 
Dude, I'm low-key surprised that politicians are being so quiet about the PATH fare hikes πŸ€”πŸš‚ #CarCultureVsPublicTransportation. It seems like they're prioritizing car convenience over public transportation improvements πŸš—πŸ’¨. The contrast with their opposition to congestion pricing is wild πŸŒͺ️. Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop is at least being real about the costs, but it's clear that lawmakers are more concerned with what affects them directly πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ #FareHikes #TransitAdvocacy. It'll be interesting to see how this plays out, especially since there's virtually no opposition from elected officials 😐 #PATHfarehike
 
I'm kinda curious how the politicians' silence is gonna affect their constituents... seems like they're more worried about car owners than the regular people who actually rely on public transport πŸ€”. Jersey City Mayor Fulop at least has some sense, tho - he's all about service improvements and acknowledging that it comes with a cost πŸš‚. The fact that PATH fares cover only a quarter of their costs is wild too... I guess you could say the system's got its own budget woes 😐.
 
I'm like "what's good with these politicians? They were all over the congestion pricing plan last year and now they're MIA when it comes to the PATH fare hikes" πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ... it just doesn't add up. Like, car culture is a big deal in Jersey, but I get that public transportation needs money too. But it's weird how they can be all vocal about one thing and then not give two cents on another.

It's like the people who live in Jersey City are getting taken care of with those service improvements, right? πŸš‚... but what about everyone else? The fare hike is gonna hit a lot more people than just the PATH riders. I'm no expert or anything, but it seems to me that they should at least be having some kind of conversation about how we can make public transportation more affordable for everyone.

Fulop's point about the costs adding up is a good one though... πŸ€‘... and yeah, the fact that the agency doesn't get as many subsidies as others does suck. But still, it feels like these politicians are just more worried about keeping their car-loving constituents happy than about making sure public transportation works for everyone else. πŸš—
 
I'm so frustrated with these NJ politicians 🀯. It seems like they're all about protecting their car-loving constituents' wallets, but what about the people who actually rely on public transportation? The PATH fare hikes are gonna be a disaster for low-income riders and commuters who can't afford to shell out $4/day for just one ticket πŸ€‘. And don't even get me started on how they're all mum on this when they were vocal about congestion pricing... it's like they're more concerned with maintaining their own car-friendly status quo than actually helping the public πŸš—πŸ˜’. Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop is trying to stay neutral, but come on, guys, do some fact-checking and speak up for the people who need you most! πŸ‘Š
 
πŸ€” I mean, what's up with these politicians? They were all over the place when it came to congestion pricing, but suddenly they're super quiet about the PATH fare hikes πŸš‚πŸ’Έ. It's like they forgot that not everyone has a car πŸš—πŸ‘€. Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop is trying to make an exception and say it's tied to service improvements, but I'm not buying it πŸ˜’. The fact that they're only talking about the impact on drivers and not users of public transportation is just... 😐

And don't even get me started on how much these fares are going up πŸ€‘. From $3 to $4 in 2029? That's a huge jump πŸ’Έ. It's like they're trying to make it less accessible for people who actually need public transportation 🚫. I mean, what about the lower-income riders who can barely afford their current fares? πŸ˜”

I'm just waiting for the final vote and seeing if these politicians finally come out of their shell or not πŸ—³οΈπŸ‘€
 
I'm not surprised that politicians are keeping quiet about this PATH fare hike πŸ€‘... I mean, can you blame them? The impact is gonna be felt by so few people, and those who do get affected are already on public transit, right? It's just another example of how our car culture prioritizes convenience over the greater good πŸš—πŸ’¨. And honestly, Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop seems like one of the few ones who gets it - he's willing to support the fare hike if it means better service improvements πŸ’ͺ.
 
πŸ€” I'm kinda surprised by the sudden silence from those politicians when it comes to the PATH fare hikes πŸ€‘. It's like they're all about cryin' foul over congestion pricing, but not so much when it affects their own constituents who actually use public transportation πŸš‚. The contrast is def real - they were all about takin' on MTA, but not so much about takin' care of the PATH riders πŸ‘Š. Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop at least has some credit for bein' honest about the trade-offs, though πŸ™. Meanwhile, it's just another example of car culture reppin' hard in NJ πŸ’¨. Let's hope they don't pull a fast one on us and pass that fare hike without too much controversy 😬 #PATHfarehikes #carculture #NJpolitics
 
I mean, I get why NJ politicians aren't making a big deal about the PATH fare hikes πŸ€”... it's not like they're directly affected by it, right? But at the same time, it seems kinda hypocritical that they were all against congestion pricing but are now okay with raising fares for people who actually use public transport 😐. I mean, Jersey City Mayor Fulop is cool for explaining that the fare hike is tied to service improvements and all that πŸ™Œ... but I guess that's just not sinking in with some folks. Meanwhile, it's great to see Gov Hochul speaking out for lower-income riders πŸ‘. Maybe we'll get some real change if people from different parts of the state start having these kinds of conversations πŸ’¬?
 
I'm not surprised that Jersey politicians are keeping mum about the PATH fare hikes πŸ€‘. Like, they're all about the cars and driving convenience, you know? πŸš— It's like, I get it, public transportation might be convenient for some people, but what about those of us who can't afford to drive or take a break from traffic? 🀯 And let's be real, PATH fares are still super cheap compared to driving in NYC! πŸ’Έ
 
OMG, isn't this just wild 🀯? I mean, these politicians are all about the car culture life and now they're gonna benefit from it while others foot the bill πŸ˜’. It's like they have a love affair with their cars and don't care who they hurt in the process. Meanwhile, the PATH users are stuck paying more for less πŸš‚πŸ’Έ. And NYC Gov Kathy Hochul is all about fairness? Like, what's going on here? Shouldn't she be speaking up for her constituents too? The contrast between the politicians' stance on congestion pricing and the PATH fare hike is just mind-blowing 😲.
 
πŸ€” I think its kinda weird that politicians who were so vocal about congestion pricing are now super quiet about the PATH fare hikes πŸš‚πŸ˜’ They're always talking about how bad congestion is for drivers, but what about the people who actually use public transportation? It feels like they just dont care about those people as much πŸ’ΈπŸ‘Ž. Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop is one of the few ones speaking up, saying that fares only cover a quarter of the PATH's costs πŸ€‘ But yeah, its pretty clear that car culture is still super strong in NJ and public transportation takes a backseat ⏱️.
 
I'm so frustrated with politicians who claim to care about the environment and public transportation but only speak up when it affects their car-owning constituents πŸš—πŸ’Έ. They're always moaning about congestion pricing, but now they're quiet about fare hikes that will hit commuters even harder πŸ€”. Meanwhile, NYC is getting free bus rides for kids under 12, which shows that infrastructure projects have real benefits πŸ’°. It's like politicians just can't get their priorities straight πŸ˜‚.
 
I dont get it why politicians r so silent about PATH fare hikes πŸ€”πŸ‘€. Theres a big difference btw congestion pricing & PATH fares - congestion pricing affects more ppl & costs are way higher πŸ€‘. Yet, when it comes to PATH fares, suddenly no one wants 2 speak out πŸ—£οΈ. Jersey City Mayor Fulop is the only 1 who's bein reasonable about it 😐. He says fares r tied 2 service improvements & thats fair πŸš‚. But others r just ignoring the fact that PATH fares only cover a quarter of their costs πŸ€‘. Thats not right! πŸ‘Š
 
It's pretty clear that when it comes to the wallet of the average New Jerseyan, politicians suddenly develop a case of amnesia... πŸ€‘πŸ—‘οΈ I mean, they're all over the map on congestion pricing, but PATH fares? Crickets, folks! It's like they think transit users are just invisible or something. Meanwhile, Gov. Hochul is out there pushing for fair fares that won't break the bank for low-income riders - nice touch, Governor! πŸ‘ But what about our own Gov. Murphy and Rep. Gottheimer? Can't say I'm too surprised they're MIA on this one... after all, it's not like PATH fares are going to put them out of a job or anything πŸ˜‚. And let's be real, Jersey City Mayor Fulop is just trying to cover his bases - after all, someone's gotta represent the interests of PATH riders around here... πŸ€”.
 
I gotta say, I'm kinda surprised by how quiet some of these politicians are about the PATH fare hikes πŸ€”. It's like they're more worried about their own car-owning constituents than the people who actually use public transportation πŸš—. And now that it's all but a done deal, I wonder what'll happen to those lawmakers who were so quick to bash congestion pricing πŸ’Έ. Will they just sit back and collect their salaries while the average Joe has to shell out more cash for a ride? Not exactly the kind of leadership you want from your elected officials πŸ™„.
 
Ugh, sounds like Jersey politicians are all about that car life lol πŸš—πŸ˜’. I mean, they were quick to freak out over congestion pricing but now they're MIA when it comes to PATH fare hikes. It's like they forgot that transit users are people too πŸ‘₯. And Fulop is the only one trying to spin this as a good thing, but let's be real, it's still a huge hit to low-income riders πŸ€‘. Meanwhile, NYC Gov Kathy Hochul is over here being a transit hero πŸ™Œ. This whole thing just reeks of car-centricity and lack of consideration for those who can't afford to drive πŸ’Έ.
 
Back
Top