NYC enforcing new safety rules for cranes after 2-year probe into Midtown collapse

New York City Steps Up Safety Measures for Tower Cranes Amid Ongoing Probe into Midtown Collapse

The city's Department of Buildings is cracking down on safety protocols for tower cranes, enforcing stricter regulations after a nearly two-year investigation into a partial crane collapse that injured several people in Midtown last year. The new measures aim to prevent similar incidents by mandating fire suppression and detection systems for diesel-powered cranes.

According to the findings of the probe, the crane's boom peeled away from its base during the collapse, leaving it plummeting to the ground after a fire broke out on the deck. The blaze was allegedly sparked when flammable hydraulic fuel oil sprayed out of a disconnected hose and made contact with the hot surface on the deck.

Experts point to similar incidents involving cranes from the same manufacturer, Favelle Favco, in Australia, where two separate collapses occurred in 2012 and 2016. In response, the company recommended measures to its customers to prevent crane fires and boom failures – a precautionary measure that was allegedly ignored at the Midtown construction site.

As part of the new regulations, people in charge of operating and supervising these machines must now meet more stringent experience qualifications, including having over 3,000 hours of experience and certain industry certifications. The city is also introducing a new license class for operators of smaller hoisting machines, requiring them to have more than 3,000 hours of experience.

The move comes after the investigation into the Midtown collapse concluded that several safety protocols were not being followed by New York Crane and Equipment Corp., the company at the center of the probe. The general contractor on the project, Monadnock Construction Inc., has since received four safety violations and is contesting one of the dismissals.

The Buildings Commissioner has hailed the new regulations as a step towards improving construction safety, stating that injuries and incidents are at their lowest level in over a decade due to "rigorous enforcement of the city's safety codes" and consistent reevaluations of those rules.
 
I'm not sure if its entirely fair to be stricter on just one company but I can see why they'd want to take precautions after what happened in Midtown πŸ€”. A fire and a crane falling to the ground is super scary, so yeah it makes sense to make changes to prevent that kind of thing from happening again. More experience for operators would definitely help reduce the risk of accidents. And I think its good that they're introducing new license classes too, just like in Australia where Favelle Favco had similar issues πŸ“ˆ. Maybe its time to be more proactive about safety instead of reactive? πŸ’‘
 
I'm all about prioritizing public safety, just like in the movie "The Day After Tomorrow" πŸŒͺ️ when the world has to come together to face a disaster. The new regulations on tower cranes in NYC are a huge step forward. I mean, who needs a catastrophic crane collapse like in that documentary "Tower of Truth"? Not me, that's for sure 😱.

Seriously though, with stricter safety protocols and more stringent experience qualifications for operators, it's about time we saw some real change. Those new regulations might just be the wake-up call we need to make construction safer for everyone involved. And let's hope those in charge of these machines take their job seriously – no more ignoring safety precautions like the company at the center of the Midtown probe did πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ.

It's not about being paranoid, but it's always better to err on the side of caution when it comes to something as critical as construction equipment. I guess you could say this is a 'building' block towards safer workplaces πŸ—οΈπŸ’ͺ!
 
🚧😬 just read about the new safety measures for tower cranes in NYC and I'm kinda relieved but also worried πŸ€”. all these new regulations sound good on paper, but I've got a bad feeling that someone will still manage to find a way to ignore them or exploit loopholes. those 3,000+ hours of experience requirements seem like a good start, but what about the companies who can't afford to pay their operators that much? πŸ€‘ it's gonna be interesting to see how this all plays out... and btw, have you heard about any other crane collapses in the US lately? 🚧😨
 
Ugh I cant believe what happened last year with that crane collapse 😱 it was so reckless and now they're finally taking steps to make sure something like that never happens again πŸ™ the fact that people were ignoring fire suppression systems is just insane πŸ”₯ I mean i get it accidents can happen but come on guys let's get our priorities straight πŸ’β€β™€οΈ at least the city is being proactive about enforcing stricter regulations and making operators meet more stringent experience qualifications πŸ‘ fingers crossed it works and we don't see another incident like that anytime soon 🀞
 
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this... I mean, can you believe it's been two years since that crazy crane collapse in Midtown? Like, what even is the point of having regulations if people just gonna ignore 'em, right? πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ The fact that they had to look at other incidents in Australia for guidance is just wild. And now we're stuck with these new rules that are supposed to prevent this kind of thing from happening again... it's like, don't they trust the people operating these machines to get it right? πŸ™„ I guess you can't blame 'em for taking precautions though, and at least the city is trying to be proactive about safety. But still... some questions remain unanswered, and I'm not sure if this is just a Band-Aid solution or actual progress.
 
😊 I gotta say, tower cranes in NYC can be super sketchy already but this new safety upgrade is like a much-needed reboot πŸ€–πŸ’»! Those Favelle Favco incidents in Australia were pretty scary and it's crazy that they didn't take the warnings seriously... on top of the fact that the NYC crane collapsed in the first place 😱. The stricter regulations are definitely a step in the right direction, especially with operators needing 3k+ hours of experience now πŸ“ˆ. Not to mention, fire suppression systems for diesel-powered cranes? That's like, basic but essential πŸ’‘! What do you guys think about this new move? πŸ€”
 
🚨 cranes are like, totally sketchy πŸ€” I mean, how can you even have a fire on top of one of these massive machines? Like, what if it spreads to other parts of the building or nearby buildings? It's not just about the crane itself, but also the surrounding area. And those 3k hours of experience? That's still pretty vague. I feel like we need more transparency and accountability in construction projects. πŸ“
 
πŸš§πŸ’‘ just think about it... a tower crane can be like a skyscraper for the construction site πŸ—ΌοΈ, but what if it loses control? 🀯 the investigation showed that a small spark (literally) can cause a massive chain reaction πŸ”₯, and now we have to take safety super serious.
πŸ“Š let's see... 3,000 hours of experience required for crane operators πŸ‘¨β€πŸ’Ό is like, almost full-time work right? πŸ•°οΈ but it might be worth it if it saves lives πŸ’”. I just wish the company took those precautionary measures from Favelle Favco more seriously πŸ™„, we can learn from mistakes to build safer structures πŸ”©.
 
Back
Top