New York City's Future: Can It Handle Three New Casinos?
The New York State Gaming Facility Location Board has handed down a recommendation that the city can support three full-fledged casino gambling operations, with one in the Bronx and two in Queens. The board's decision is based on projections of $13 billion in taxes generated over the first decade of operation, but critics say the plan neglects the cannibalization question: how these new casinos will affect each other.
The board's chair, Vicki Been, acknowledged that her consultants used a "very conservative" approach to assess the market's ability to sustain multiple casinos. However, Bennett Liebman, a former member of the New York State Racing and Wagering Board, believes the process was ill-considered. Liebman thinks the new casinos will be located far from Manhattan's central commercial districts, which are more likely to attract tourists and generate economic development.
The five finalists for casino licenses include Bally’s Bronx at Ferry Point, Hard Rock Metropolitan Park near Citi Field, and Resorts World New York City, an expanded facility where the Aqueduct Racetrack is situated. Proponents claim these projects will create thousands of new jobs and revive local communities. However, opponents argue that this proliferation of casinos will lead to economic cannibalization, harming existing businesses.
Experts predict that the total downstate casino market could reach $5.5 billion in gross gaming revenue by 2033, which would be more than enough to sustain a robust industry. Anthony Lucas, a professor of casino management at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, agrees that New York City's large and diverse population makes it an ideal market for multiple casinos.
However, not everyone shares this optimism. A report by Vivian Lu, a researcher at the Urban Institute, suggests that the Hard Rock Metropolitan Park project could displace nearly 16,000 renters in Corona and Flushing. Local residents like Sarah Ahn express concern that the casino will exacerbate existing issues of displacement and increase housing costs.
Governor Kathy Hochul and other proponents praise the decision, citing billions in tax revenue and thousands of jobs to be created. However, opponents continue to voice their concerns about the potential negative impacts on local communities. As the Gaming Commission prepares to make its final decision, it remains to be seen whether New York City can truly handle three new casinos without sacrificing the interests of long-time residents and businesses.
The New York State Gaming Facility Location Board has handed down a recommendation that the city can support three full-fledged casino gambling operations, with one in the Bronx and two in Queens. The board's decision is based on projections of $13 billion in taxes generated over the first decade of operation, but critics say the plan neglects the cannibalization question: how these new casinos will affect each other.
The board's chair, Vicki Been, acknowledged that her consultants used a "very conservative" approach to assess the market's ability to sustain multiple casinos. However, Bennett Liebman, a former member of the New York State Racing and Wagering Board, believes the process was ill-considered. Liebman thinks the new casinos will be located far from Manhattan's central commercial districts, which are more likely to attract tourists and generate economic development.
The five finalists for casino licenses include Bally’s Bronx at Ferry Point, Hard Rock Metropolitan Park near Citi Field, and Resorts World New York City, an expanded facility where the Aqueduct Racetrack is situated. Proponents claim these projects will create thousands of new jobs and revive local communities. However, opponents argue that this proliferation of casinos will lead to economic cannibalization, harming existing businesses.
Experts predict that the total downstate casino market could reach $5.5 billion in gross gaming revenue by 2033, which would be more than enough to sustain a robust industry. Anthony Lucas, a professor of casino management at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, agrees that New York City's large and diverse population makes it an ideal market for multiple casinos.
However, not everyone shares this optimism. A report by Vivian Lu, a researcher at the Urban Institute, suggests that the Hard Rock Metropolitan Park project could displace nearly 16,000 renters in Corona and Flushing. Local residents like Sarah Ahn express concern that the casino will exacerbate existing issues of displacement and increase housing costs.
Governor Kathy Hochul and other proponents praise the decision, citing billions in tax revenue and thousands of jobs to be created. However, opponents continue to voice their concerns about the potential negative impacts on local communities. As the Gaming Commission prepares to make its final decision, it remains to be seen whether New York City can truly handle three new casinos without sacrificing the interests of long-time residents and businesses.