Europe's push to become a self-sufficient AI superpower has gained momentum as the continent's long-standing alliance with the US falters. European countries are seeking inventive ways to close the gap with American rivals that have dominated the field for years.
The US currently outstrips Europe across various aspects of AI production, including processor design and manufacturing, data center capacity, model development, and application development. The country has also captured a significant proportion of the money pouring into AI, reflecting in the performance of its homegrown stocks and the growth of its economy.
However, some quarters believe that the US-based leaders are already so entrenched as to make it impossible for European nations to break their dependence on American AI. This sentiment is echoed by the head of Belgium's national cybersecurity organization, who recently stated that Europe had "lost the internet" and should accept a degree of reliance on US infrastructure.
Yet, governments in the UK and EU are not ready to give up on this goal. They have committed hundreds of millions of dollars to minimizing their reliance on foreign AI suppliers, while also pursuing alternative methods for developing competitive products built around imaginative model design.
One possible advantage that European AI labs hold over large American firms is a willingness to develop out in the open. By publishing models for anyone to use or modify, breakthroughs achieved by European labs can compound as they are further refined by collaborators.
In recent months, European leaders have clashed with the Trump administration over various issues, including policing American tech firms and trade policies. The two sides have openly criticized each other's approaches, leading to speculation about a deterioration in the NATO alliance.
Against this backdrop, Europe's reliance on American-made AI begins to look more like a liability. In a worst-case scenario, the US could choose to withhold access to AI services and crucial digital infrastructure. More plausibly, the Trump administration could use Europe's dependence as leverage in trade negotiations.
European nations are attempting to hedge against these risks by bringing the production of AI onshore through funding programs, targeted deregulation, and partnerships with academic institutions. Some efforts focus on building competitive large language models for native European languages, such as Apertus and GPT-NL.
However, bridging the performance gap remains a challenge. American firms like Nvidia, Google, and Meta continue to dominate the field, leaving smaller European competitors struggling to keep up. Even with significant investments in AI research and development, it is unclear whether Europe can catch up with its US rivals.
The push for "digital sovereignty" in Europe raises questions about what exactly this means. Does it demand total self-sufficiency across the entire AI supply chain, or only an improved capability in specific disciplines? Is it possible to achieve digital sovereignty without excluding US-based providers?
Despite these challenges and uncertainties, many experts believe that it is still possible for European labs to make significant progress in AI research and development. The success of China-based AI lab DeepSeek, which shattered the dogma that control over the largest fleet of AI processors determines which firm wins out, has inspired a new wave of European initiatives.
One such initiative is SOOFI, an open-source model development project aiming to put out a competitive general-purpose language model with roughly 100 billion parameters within the next year. According to its lead, Wolfgang Nejdl, this project intends to make Europe's DeepSeek.
The US currently outstrips Europe across various aspects of AI production, including processor design and manufacturing, data center capacity, model development, and application development. The country has also captured a significant proportion of the money pouring into AI, reflecting in the performance of its homegrown stocks and the growth of its economy.
However, some quarters believe that the US-based leaders are already so entrenched as to make it impossible for European nations to break their dependence on American AI. This sentiment is echoed by the head of Belgium's national cybersecurity organization, who recently stated that Europe had "lost the internet" and should accept a degree of reliance on US infrastructure.
Yet, governments in the UK and EU are not ready to give up on this goal. They have committed hundreds of millions of dollars to minimizing their reliance on foreign AI suppliers, while also pursuing alternative methods for developing competitive products built around imaginative model design.
One possible advantage that European AI labs hold over large American firms is a willingness to develop out in the open. By publishing models for anyone to use or modify, breakthroughs achieved by European labs can compound as they are further refined by collaborators.
In recent months, European leaders have clashed with the Trump administration over various issues, including policing American tech firms and trade policies. The two sides have openly criticized each other's approaches, leading to speculation about a deterioration in the NATO alliance.
Against this backdrop, Europe's reliance on American-made AI begins to look more like a liability. In a worst-case scenario, the US could choose to withhold access to AI services and crucial digital infrastructure. More plausibly, the Trump administration could use Europe's dependence as leverage in trade negotiations.
European nations are attempting to hedge against these risks by bringing the production of AI onshore through funding programs, targeted deregulation, and partnerships with academic institutions. Some efforts focus on building competitive large language models for native European languages, such as Apertus and GPT-NL.
However, bridging the performance gap remains a challenge. American firms like Nvidia, Google, and Meta continue to dominate the field, leaving smaller European competitors struggling to keep up. Even with significant investments in AI research and development, it is unclear whether Europe can catch up with its US rivals.
The push for "digital sovereignty" in Europe raises questions about what exactly this means. Does it demand total self-sufficiency across the entire AI supply chain, or only an improved capability in specific disciplines? Is it possible to achieve digital sovereignty without excluding US-based providers?
Despite these challenges and uncertainties, many experts believe that it is still possible for European labs to make significant progress in AI research and development. The success of China-based AI lab DeepSeek, which shattered the dogma that control over the largest fleet of AI processors determines which firm wins out, has inspired a new wave of European initiatives.
One such initiative is SOOFI, an open-source model development project aiming to put out a competitive general-purpose language model with roughly 100 billion parameters within the next year. According to its lead, Wolfgang Nejdl, this project intends to make Europe's DeepSeek.
I think EU nations are getting it right by trying to develop their own AI tech - we can't rely on US firms forever 
It's like having a strong engine if you have multiple fuel sources 
Not gonna happen just 'cause the US has an edge now, there'll be other countries with innovative solutions soon! 
I think Europe has no choice but to keep pushing for digital sovereignty 
especially now that our reliance on US-made AI is being seen as a liability 
. Those American firms are too big and powerful, it's like they're holding us back 
. But at the same time, we can't just ignore the risks of cutting ourselves off from their tech expertise 
. I mean, look at DeepSeek breaking through with those massive AI processors - it's not about being self-sufficient, but about being innovative 
! And if SOOFI can deliver a competitive general-purpose language model, that's gonna be huge for Europe 
they're so ahead in processor design and data center capacity... i mean how can europe compete with that? 
but at least european labs are trying, like SOOFI and apertus... 
those projects are cool because they're open-source and stuff... maybe europe can learn from china's deepseek 
BUT SERIOUSLY FOLKS IF EU LEADERS WANT TO CATCH UP WITH THE AMERICANS THEY NEED TO START THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX AND SUPPORTING LOCAL STARTUPS AND INNOVATORS 
. The thing is, the US has been in this game for decades, so it's not like Europe is going to magically become a top-tier player just because they start throwing money at AI development 
. And what about the whole "digital sovereignty" thing? Is that just a fancy way of saying "we don't want anyone from outside our borders to make our tech"? 
I mean, come on, we're in the 21st century – global collaboration is where it's at! 
. Like, the more they push against the US, the more innovation they'll get out of it, right? 
. maybe china's example has inspired them? SOOFI seems like a cool project tho 
. It sounds good on paper, but let's be real, most European labs are just gonna end up copying what the US is already doing with their own AI products. It's like trying to compete in a marathon by running the same route as everyone else 
.
. They can't just keep playing catch-up and expecting to win 
.
.
... I mean, it makes sense that they'd have more resources and experience, but does that really mean they're untouchable? 
. And let's be real, trying to compete with the likes of Nvidia and Google is like trying to catch a speeding bullet 
.
And I love how SOOFI is taking an open-source approach to model development... it's like they're saying, "Hey, let's work together and share our knowledge!" 
. It's like, yeah, we get it, the US has had a head start and all that, but don't write us off just yet 
. If European labs can keep pushing out innovative models and solutions, maybe we won't be stuck in the dark ages of AI 
. The thing is, it's not about being self-sufficient or whatever, it's about creating a level playing field where everyone can innovate and grow 
like wut about the money tho ?? americans have got that in spades 
americans are just too far ahead & i dont think europe can catch up 4 a while 
We don't want to be left in the dark like Belgium's head said we should just accept. That doesn't sound too bright. 
️
.
it's like trying to build a house on shaky ground 
I mean, who's gonna benefit from this - Europe's economy or American tech giants?