The world's digital empires are jostling for power – in Europe, we can't afford to be useful idiots | Thierry Breton

European Union's Digital Sovereignty Under Threat as Power Struggle Erupts Over Internet Governance

The European Union, known for its commitment to protecting citizens' rights and promoting a free market economy, finds itself at the center of a growing power struggle over internet governance. The EU's digital sovereignty is being challenged by its major trading partners, including the US, China, Russia, and others, who are pushing for their own vision of the information space.

The current state of play sees four major laws adopted by the EU between 2022 and 2024 - the Digital Services Act, the Digital Markets Act, the Data Act, and the AI Act. These laws aim to protect users, businesses, and democracies from various forms of abuse in the digital space. However, with the US, China, Russia, and other major players vying for control, it is becoming increasingly challenging for Europe to assert its sovereignty.

The US model prioritizes private actors and minimal oversight, allowing a few major companies to dominate cyberspace and impose their standards on others. In contrast, China relies on state control and mass surveillance to steer the digital landscape. Russia takes a more extreme approach, claiming information sovereignty and imposing strict content controls to shape its geopolitical agenda.

The EU has chosen a different path, relying on its internal market and legal arsenal to ensure cohesion, protect users, guarantee transparency, and safeguard democracies. However, this stance is now under threat from attempts to weaken the four pillars of European digital law.

It is imperative that Europe resists these efforts and maintains its commitment to digital sovereignty. This requires a collective effort, combining ambitious regulation, massive investment, sovereign innovation, coordinated action, and developing its talent pool. The EU must invest in research, critical infrastructure, and cybersecurity while fostering industry champions capable of competing with big tech.

A genuine single capital market is also essential for Europe to achieve global standards and move beyond prototypes or showpieces. Digital autonomy requires freeing the EU from external jurisdictions governing data, localising and certifying critical infrastructure, and expanding the role of open-source solutions.

As Thierry Breton, the former European commissioner for internal markets and digital affairs, notes, "Sovereignty is not bought, it is built." Europe must now assert its digital sovereignty by combining regulatory efforts with investment, innovation, and cooperation. The fate of its digital landscape hangs in the balance, and the EU's response will determine whether it emerges as a credible global player or remains a passive observer to the emerging digital empires.
 
I'm super worried about this 🤕. EU is already dealing with so many issues like Brexit and climate change, but adding internet governance power struggle on top of that? It's like, how can they protect their citizens' rights when everyone else is trying to dominate the digital space? 🤔 I think Europe needs to step up its game and invest in research and innovation to stay ahead. We need more open-source solutions and critical infrastructure to make our own tech standards, not just copy others. It's like, if you don't control your own digital sovereignty, who will? 💻 The US and China are already taking over our online spaces, and it's time for Europe to push back! 👊
 
I THINK THE EU NEEDS TO GET ITS ACT TOGETHER HERE, THEY CAN'T JUST SIT BACK AND LET OTHER COUNTRIES STEAL THEIR DIGITAL SOVEREIGNTY 🤯🌐 I MEAN, COME ON, THEY'VE GOT SOME OF THE BEST REGULATIONS IN PLACE AND NOW IT'S LIKE THEY'RE GIVING AWAY THE FARM TO THESE POWER-HUNGRY NATION-STATES! USA, CHINA, RUSSIA... WHO ARE THEY TO TELL THE EU HOW TO RUN THEIR DIGITAL LANDSCAPE?! 🙄👊
 
🤔 think its a big deal for europe but also kinda understandable that other countries wanna influence whats goin on in cyberspace tho 🌐 they got some good ideas like open-source solutions and stuff 💡 maybe europe can just find a middle ground instead of tryna be too strict or whatever 🙅‍♂️
 
idk why europe is making such a big deal about this 🤔. they're just being paranoid about their own interests. the US and china aren't exactly perfect themselves when it comes to internet governance. can't europe just chill and be like "hey, we'll figure it out ourselves"? 🙄

i mean, china's approach is kinda extreme but at least they're trying to control what's going on in their own country. europe's all like "oh no, the world is too much for us" 😂. and then there's russia, who just wanna impose their own will on everyone else? sounds suspicious 🤷‍♀️

anyway, it seems like europe's got some solid laws in place already (digital services act, digital markets act, etc), so maybe they can just stick to what they're good at: being all fancy and regulative 💁‍♀️. dont need to get caught up in this whole "sovereignty" thing 🙅‍♂️
 
The notion that Europe is at a crossroads in terms of internet governance is rather fascinating 🤔. It seems to me that we're witnessing a classic game of geopolitics, where major powers are vying for control over the global information space. The EU's approach, which prioritizes user protection and democracies, appears to be an admirable attempt to carve out its own niche. However, with the US model exerting significant influence and China's state-controlled approach gaining traction, it's clear that Europe needs to assert its sovereignty more aggressively 💪.

I'd argue that the EU's reliance on internal market regulations and legal arsenals has been effective in this regard, but more investment in research, cybersecurity, and critical infrastructure is needed to truly consolidate its position 📈. Moreover, fostering industry champions capable of competing with big tech will be crucial for Europe's global standing.

It would also be prudent for the EU to explore ways to promote digital autonomy, such as localising data storage, expanding open-source solutions, and developing a genuine single capital market 🌐. As Thierry Breton so aptly put it, "Sovereignty is not bought, it is built." The EU must now demonstrate its commitment to building this digital sovereignty through concerted efforts in regulation, investment, innovation, and cooperation 💼.
 
omg u guys think this is just about the EU vs the rest of the world? nope its more like a big game of digital chess where all these players r trying 2 control the internet 🤔. China's mass surveillance & Russia's info sovereignty r not just about them, its about what they want 2 achieve with our personal data 📊. And whats w/ the US wanting 2 undermine EU's regulations? cant they see how their own model's failing them? 🚨. we need 2 wake up & realize thats all this r about: control & profit 💸.
 
🤔 The EU's position on internet governance is pretty nuanced... I think they're right to want to protect users' rights & promote a free market economy, but at the same time, China and Russia are pushing back with their own models of state control & surveillance... it's like, how do you balance individual freedoms with national security? 🤝

I'm not sure if the EU can resist these efforts by themselves, they might need some international cooperation or a bit more investment in research & development to stay ahead... and what's up with this idea of digital autonomy, is that just a fancy way of saying ' Europe needs to level up its tech game'? 💻

It's also interesting how the US model is influencing this conversation, but at the same time, some people are worried about the lack of oversight in their approach... it's like, what's the right balance between regulation and freedom? 🤔

Anyway, I think it's a super complex issue that requires a lot of thinking & debate... and one thing for sure is that the EU can't just sit back and let other countries dictate their digital future! 💪
 
Back
Top